Purpose of This Page
Washington State has become a focal point in national debates about education, values, and parental rights.
Topics like sex education content, transgender student policies, LGBTQ+ curriculum requirements, and religious
freedom in education generate strong feelings across the political spectrum.
This page provides factual information about what Washington State law actually requires,
where different types of schools have freedom, and where constitutional protections apply. Our goal is to help
community members understand the legal landscape without dismissing anyone's deeply-held values or concerns.
Important Context: Washington State is considered one of the most progressive states on these
issues. The I-5 corridor (Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia) controls state politics and has enacted laws that reflect
progressive values. Many communities in Eastern Washington hold different values but are subject to these same
state laws. This creates real tension.
Our Approach: This page presents the facts about what the law requires while acknowledging
that people of good faith disagree strongly about whether these laws are right or wrong. Understanding the law
doesn't mean you must agree with it.
Current Washington State Law for PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Public schools (including charter schools) are subject to extensive state requirements. Here's what the law
currently mandates:
📚 Comprehensive Sex Education (Senate Bill 5395)
Requirements (effective 2022-23 school year):
- Mandatory for ALL public schools (no longer optional)
- All grade levels: K-3 (once), grades 4-5 (once), grades 6-8 (twice), grades 9-12 (twice)
- Must be "inclusive of all students" regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity
- Must be medically and scientifically accurate
- Must include affirmative consent (clear and voluntary permission)
- Must include bystander training (how to intervene in harassment situations)
- Abstinence cannot be taught to exclusion of contraception and disease prevention
What "inclusive" means in practice:
- Curriculum must acknowledge that some students have LGBTQ+ identities
- Cannot present heterosexuality as superior to other sexual orientations
- Must use language that doesn't assume all students are cisgender or heterosexual
- Content must be relevant to LGBTQ+ students, not just cisgender heterosexual students
Parental Rights:
- Parents CAN opt their children out with written notification
- Parents have the right to review curriculum materials
- Districts must notify parents of planned instruction
🚻 Transgender Student Policies (Required by January 2020)
All public school districts must:
- Allow bathroom access corresponding to student's gender identity
- Allow locker room access corresponding to student's gender identity
- Use student's chosen name and pronouns
- Update school records to reflect gender identity (except certain official documents)
- Allow sports participation consistent with gender identity (WIAA policy)
- Protect student privacy - staff cannot disclose transgender status without permission
- Provide gender-neutral facilities for students seeking additional privacy (optional for any student)
Current Federal-State Conflict (2025): The Trump administration has challenged these policies
and threatened to withhold federal funding. The U.S. Department of Education is investigating OSPI for "requiring
school boards to adopt policies that allow males to participate in female sports and occupy female-only intimate
facilities." Washington State has vowed to maintain its policies despite federal pressure. This conflict is ongoing
and unresolved.
🏳️🌈 LGBTQ+ Curriculum Requirements (Enacted 2024)
All public schools must:
- Include LGBTQ+ history and contributions in curriculum and materials
- Document "histories, contributions, and perspectives of historically marginalized groups" including LGBTQ+ people
- This applies to social studies, history, and other relevant subjects
- Makes Washington the 7th state to explicitly mandate LGBTQ+ representation in curricula
⚖️ Civil Rights Protections
Under Washington Law Against Discrimination:
- Gender identity and gender expression are protected classes
- Schools cannot discriminate based on these protected classes
- Bullying or harassment based on gender identity is discriminatory harassment
- Schools must investigate and respond to complaints
What About PRIVATE SCHOOLS?
This is where the picture changes dramatically. Private schools in Washington State have significantly
more freedom than public schools on these issues.
What Private Schools Are NOT Required To Do:
- Sex Education: NOT required to teach it at all
- LGBTQ+ Inclusive Curriculum: NOT required to include LGBTQ+ content or perspectives
- Transgender Policies: NOT required to follow public school bathroom/sports policies
- Gender Identity Policies: Can set their own policies on names, pronouns, facilities
- State Testing: NOT required (optional)
- Specific Curriculum Standards: Have flexibility in how they teach required subjects
What Private Schools ARE Required To Do:
- Teach required subjects: occupational education, science, mathematics, language,
social studies, history, health, reading, writing, spelling, art appreciation, music appreciation
- Meet minimum instructional hours: 1,000 hours or 180 days per year
- Employ mostly certified teachers (with some exceptions)
- Meet health and safety standards: fire safety, building codes, immunizations
- Annual approval by State Board of Education
- Cannot discriminate based on race
- Must have physical facility in Washington
Key Point: Private schools have the constitutional right to teach from their religious
perspective and are explicitly exempt from most of the progressive policies required in public schools. This is
why many families seeking alternatives to public school policies choose private schools.
What About CHARTER SCHOOLS?
Charter schools are a critical case because some people mistakenly think they're like private schools. They are not.
Charter Schools Are PUBLIC SCHOOLS
This means charter schools MUST:
- Follow ALL public school sex education requirements
- Follow ALL transgender student policies
- Follow ALL LGBTQ+ curriculum requirements
- Follow ALL civil rights laws
- Be nonsectarian and nonreligious in ALL practices
- Accept all students (cannot exclude based on religion, gender identity, etc.)
Bottom Line: Charter schools offer no escape from the policies that concern
conservative families. They must follow the same rules as traditional public schools on these issues. They have
autonomy in how they teach and operate, but not in following state-mandated policies on sex education,
transgender rights, or LGBTQ+ curriculum.
The Spanish-Only School Question: A Framework
Let's use a hypothetical to understand where private schools have freedom and where they don't:
Hypothetical: "I'm an American citizen of Mexican heritage. I speak some English but Spanish
is my primary language. Can I start a private school in Washington State that teaches only in Spanish, not English?"
The Answer: No, But...
Why NO:
- Washington law requires private schools to teach "language" as a required subject
- This has been consistently interpreted to mean English language instruction
- Students must be prepared to "meet usual state graduation requirements"
- Graduation requirements include English proficiency
- Private schools must demonstrate students are receiving "sufficient basic education"
Why "BUT...":
- You COULD teach primarily in Spanish as long as English is included as a required subject
- This is how dual-language and bilingual schools work
- You could have Spanish-language instruction for most subjects with English as one subject area
- You could create a Spanish immersion program that includes English instruction
- You could teach American history from a Mexican-American perspective (curriculum freedom)
- You could celebrate Mexican culture, holidays, and heritage
What This Teaches Us
This hypothetical illustrates an important principle: Private schools have curriculum freedom within the
framework of teaching required subjects.
- The STATE sets minimum content requirements (what subjects must be covered)
- The SCHOOL decides HOW to teach those subjects and from what perspective
- The SCHOOL can add religious, cultural, or other content beyond minimum requirements
- The SCHOOL cannot completely exclude required subjects
Applying This to Sex Education
Just as a Spanish-language school must teach English (required subject), one might ask: Must private schools
teach comprehensive sex education?
Answer: NO.
- "Health" is a required subject, but sex education is NOT a required component of health for
private schools
- Private schools can teach health without comprehensive sex education
- Private schools can teach abstinence-only if they choose
- Private schools can teach from religious perspectives on sexuality
- Private schools can exclude LGBTQ+ content entirely
This is a critical distinction: The state requires "health" as a subject but
does NOT mandate comprehensive sex education for private schools the way it does for public schools.
Religious Freedom and Constitutional Rights
Can Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists Start Private Schools?
Answer: Absolutely Yes.
The First Amendment protects religious freedom for ALL religions, not just Christianity. If Christians can start
private religious schools, then so can adherents of any other faith.
- Muslim schools can teach Islam, require hijab, teach Arabic, pray 5 times daily
- Jewish schools can teach Torah, observe Sabbath, teach Hebrew, follow kosher rules
- Hindu schools can teach Vedic philosophy, Sanskrit, yoga as spiritual practice
- Buddhist schools can teach Buddhist philosophy and meditation practices
- Christian schools can teach the Bible, pray, teach from Christian worldview
All private religious schools in Washington have the same rights and the same requirements.
The state cannot favor one religion over another.
What All Religious Private Schools Share
- Same approval process (annual approval by State Board of Education)
- Same basic requirements (required subjects, hours, certified teachers, health/safety)
- Same freedoms (curriculum perspective, religious content, student selection)
- Same exemptions (sex ed, LGBTQ+ curriculum, transgender policies)
- Same limitations (cannot discriminate on race, must have physical facility in WA)
Why This Matters for Conservative Christians
Some Christian families express concern about Muslim or other non-Christian schools. However, the constitutional
principle that protects Christian schools from government interference is the same principle
that protects schools of all faiths.
Important Legal Principle: You cannot have religious freedom "for us but not for them." The
First Amendment protects all religions equally. If the state could restrict Muslim schools, it could also restrict
Christian schools. Religious freedom is an all-or-nothing proposition under the Constitution.
Understanding the Tensions
These issues create real conflicts between deeply-held values. Rather than pretend these tensions don't exist,
let's acknowledge them honestly.
Perspective 1: Progressive Values
Why support these policies?
- LGBTQ+ youth face higher rates of bullying, depression, and suicide
- Inclusive education helps LGBTQ+ students feel seen, safe, and supported
- Comprehensive sex education reduces teen pregnancy, STIs, and sexual assault
- Abstinence-only education has been shown to be ineffective
- Affirmative consent training addresses sexual assault and helps prevent it
- Transgender students deserve equal access to facilities and activities
- Public schools serve all students and must be welcoming to everyone
- Historical discrimination against LGBTQ+ people requires active remediation
Perspective 2: Conservative/Religious Values
Why oppose these policies?
- Religious beliefs teach that sex is for marriage between man and woman
- Gender is biological and determined by God at birth, not changeable
- Parents, not schools, should teach children about sexuality
- Young children (K-3) are too young to learn about sex and gender identity
- Girls' privacy and safety are compromised by males in female facilities
- Girls' sports are undermined by biological males competing
- Social transition may harm confused children who would otherwise desist
- Schools hiding information from parents violates parental rights
- This represents moral relativism that conflicts with religious truth claims
The Real Conflict
These perspectives are not easily reconciled. They represent fundamentally different understandings of:
- What gender is (biological fact vs. internal identity)
- Whose rights take priority (LGBTQ+ students vs. students with religious/safety concerns)
- The role of schools (full inclusion vs. respecting family values)
- The role of parents (primary vs. shared with state)
- The nature of truth (multiple valid perspectives vs. objective moral truth)
Honest Assessment: Washington State has clearly chosen the progressive position on these issues.
The I-5 corridor controls state politics, and these policies reflect those values. Families in Eastern Washington
and rural areas who hold conservative or religious views find themselves subject to laws they strongly oppose.
This creates genuine hardship for families who feel the state is undermining their values and parental authority.
Options for Families
Given this legal landscape, what options do families have who disagree with these policies?
Option 1: Remain in Public School
Advantages:
- Free (no tuition)
- Convenient (neighborhood schools)
- Parents can opt out of sex education
- Can advocate for change through school board elections
- Expose children to diverse perspectives
Limitations:
- Cannot opt out of transgender policies or LGBTQ+ curriculum
- School culture may conflict with family values
- Children may face pressure to conform to progressive norms
- Limited ability to control what children are exposed to
Option 2: Private School
Advantages:
- Can choose school aligned with family values
- Exempt from sex ed, LGBTQ+ curriculum, transgender policies
- Can teach from religious perspective
- Can set own policies on bathrooms, sports, pronouns
- Smaller class sizes (typically)
Limitations:
- Tuition costs ($5,000-$30,000+ per year)
- May not be available locally (limited options in rural areas)
- Transportation challenges
- Limited resources compared to public schools
- Must still meet state minimum standards
Option 3: Homeschooling
Advantages:
- Maximum parental control over curriculum and values
- Can completely avoid objectionable content
- Flexible schedule and pace
- Strong family bonding
- Lower cost than private school
Limitations:
- Requires parent to be home (income sacrifice)
- Limited socialization opportunities
- Parent must be teacher
- Must meet state homeschool requirements
- No access to public school sports/activities (in most cases)
Option 4: Charter School
Reality Check: Charter schools do NOT offer relief from these policies.
- Must follow all the same requirements as traditional public schools
- Only 16-18 charter schools exist in Washington (capped at 40)
- Application window for new charters is CLOSED
- Cannot be religious
- Must be tuition-free and accept all students
Political and Legal Remedies
Families who oppose current Washington policies have several avenues for seeking change:
State-Level Action
- Vote in state elections for legislators who share your values
- Contact state legislators to oppose or modify these laws
- Support initiative campaigns to change laws through ballot measures
- Organize with like-minded groups for collective advocacy
- Run for State Legislature yourself or support candidates
Local-Level Action
- Elect school board members who share your concerns
- Attend school board meetings and speak during public comment
- Request curriculum reviews to see what's being taught
- Organize parent groups for mutual support and advocacy
- Build relationships with teachers and administrators
Federal-Level Hope?
The Trump administration (2025) has challenged some of these policies and threatened to withhold federal funding
from Washington. However:
- Federal government has limited authority over state education policies
- Washington State has vowed to maintain its policies regardless
- Legal challenges are ongoing and outcomes uncertain
- Federal funding represents only 10-15% of education budgets
- This could change with different federal administrations
Legal Challenges
Some groups are pursuing legal challenges to these policies based on:
- Parental rights under the Constitution
- Religious freedom protections
- Title IX interpretations (sex vs. gender identity)
- Privacy rights of female students
- Free speech rights of students and teachers
These legal challenges face significant obstacles in Washington State courts, which tend to be progressive.
Summary: Know Your Rights and Options
If You're in a PUBLIC SCHOOL (including charter):
- Your school MUST follow all state policies on sex ed, transgender rights, LGBTQ+ curriculum
- You CAN opt your child out of sex education
- You CANNOT opt out of transgender bathroom policies or LGBTQ+ history inclusion
- You CAN advocate for policy changes through school board and state legislature
- You CAN transfer to a different public school if available
If You Choose a PRIVATE SCHOOL:
- The school CAN teach from religious or traditional values perspective
- The school is NOT required to follow public school sex ed or transgender policies
- The school MUST still teach required subjects and meet basic standards
- The school CAN set its own policies on bathrooms, sports, pronouns, dress codes
- You WILL pay tuition (significant cost)
If You Choose HOMESCHOOLING:
- You HAVE maximum control over curriculum and values
- You MUST meet state homeschool requirements (180 days, required subjects, annual testing)
- You MUST file declaration of intent with school district
- You TAKE ON full responsibility for education
Constitutional Protections
- Religious freedom protects all faiths equally (Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, etc.)
- Private schools can teach from religious perspectives
- Parental rights to direct children's upbringing are constitutionally protected
- Free speech allows you to express disagreement with these policies
- Opt-out rights for sex education are protected
Final Thoughts
These are difficult issues that touch on people's deepest values about family, sexuality, gender, parental
authority, and religious faith. Reasonable people of good will disagree strongly.
What we can agree on:
- Parents love their children and want what's best for them
- Teachers are trying to create safe, welcoming environments
- Young people deserve to be treated with dignity and respect
- Education is important for all children's futures
- Communities function best when we can disagree respectfully
Moving forward:
- Understand the law as it currently exists
- Make informed choices for your family
- Engage politically if you want change
- Treat those who disagree with basic respect
- Recognize that not all conflicts can be resolved to everyone's satisfaction
Remember: Understanding what the law requires doesn't mean you must agree with it. This page
aims to provide factual information to help families navigate a complex legal landscape, not to advocate for any
particular position on these deeply divisive issues.
← Back to Main Site